WEX Photographic. NB

I’ve recently started contributing articles to the UK’s leading online photographic retailer, WEX Photographic (formerly Warehouse Express), for their blog. So if you’ve come from there, welcome! Three posts on the field studio technique have just gone up today. And, wow, that site gets some traffic! This is the first retailer I’ve contacted about cooperation who have had the courtesy to reply; good on them.

Newly leafed out beech - but it won't look this way for long this year.

Newly leafed out beech – but it won’t look this way for long this year. Incidentally this isn’t a field studio shot – it’s made with daylight only.

It continues to be a wretched spring here is east central Scotland: we’ve had one “hot”(15 degrees) day so far this spring but single figures with strong winds are the norm. Any more wind and we’ll see the bad leaf burn that was so prevalent two years ago. No wonder I make so many “optimistic” pictures against white…

Posted in Comment | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Memories are made of this…PHD

On his last post Clay asked about the connection of our readers with nature, well I, for one, cannot imagine my life without being metaphorically ‘plugged in’ to what is around me. Through times of blissful joy and even deep sadness, of elation and deep depression, nature has been friend, comfort, saviour and a ready means of escape.

_DSC2913

We have a ‘calenda’r here on the Italian hillside that anticipates the end to hard and prolonged winters. The first hoopoes call in mid March roughly contemporaneous with the yack-yacking that heralds the arrival of wrynecks: this year, on the 31st March (some four days earlier than other years) our nightingales sounded the first long notes of their  ’wind-up’ before they go full throttle, day and night. Orioles chimed the first liquid cadence five days ago and today, 18th April the ‘boys are back in town’…a squadron of bee eaters returning to their cliff holes some 500m from our house. Others who love nature will understand our joy: many would look askance if I even bothered to try and explain.

Most days, whether for an hour or much more, I engage in some form of manual work – it is the price one pays for living in (and simultaneously renovating) an old house on a hill in Italy. Other than the ‘building site‘  there is the garden some two acres of far-from-manicured land, where grass and other plants vie for supremacy and have to be kept at bay. Podere Montecucco (literally nutter’s hill farm) was an old farmstead and the residual nitrogenous matter in the soil enables us to grow immense nettles: the balance lies in retaining large patches for the larvae of colourful butterflies and being able to walk unstung.

_DSC2922

I can survive repetitive (and occasionally painful) work by letting my mind wander – bringing it quickly back in control when using the table saw and other potentially lethal machinery. I never really know what the day will bring, but it inevitably means that memories are dragged up from the depths of my cerebral cortex. In fact, it alarms me that millions of useful brain cells are dying daily via the ageing process ad leaving those that store the inane words of and obscure 60’s surfin’ songs and 70‘s ‘prog rock’ riffs for example! There are also those moments of near-excruciating embarrassment where it is as if some inner imp says “having a nice day, my friend well…remember this. Cringe baby cringe.”

Smells are for me a most potent trigger (Smell – how does it affect your personal perception of nature ?) and I have written on this before. The act of pruning a straggling plant of thyme sends me back to my first trip to Crete to walk along a ridge in a storm where this plant formed the scrub or ‘phrygana’. The smell of a coal fire when first lit, with its complex tars and sulphurous overtones, catapults me back to a grey day in Pontycymer, the one-time mining village in the Welsh valleys where I lived for the first 4 years of my life.

Yesterday, I felt weary but happy for winter seems to have gone and I could work in a higher ambient temperature at a greater rate of production. I needed to escape the piles of sawdust and shavings and so wandered down our track to an accompanying film score of nightingales, hoopoes, cuckoo and wryneck…with blackcaps, blackbirds and many others also vocally denoting their territories. I crossed the ditch that marks our boundary  to the field beyond, splashed with dandelions and speedwell, to look back towards the house, still visible before the oaks and walnut leaves draw a veil over the old place. I wanted to try and get some panoramas using that very function in the Sony NEX 7 to frame things with the blackthorn hedge – food plant for scarce swallowtails and a source of materials for sloe gin!

One of my favourite butterflies i the orange tip (Anthocaris cardamines)

One of my favourite butterflies is the orange tip (Anthocaris cardamines)

From the corner of my eye I saw the first male orange tip crossing the field  and the time machine within my brain thrust me back to May 1955.  This is an annual event where the delicious joy of seeing one of my favourite butterflies again is tinged with a profound sadness that always makes me well up inside as vivid and precious memories of a small life lost take hold.

I first saw this harbinger of spring in the grassland at the foot of the path at my paternal grandmother’s home flitting amongst the cuckoo flowers. The sense of its beauty enchanted me – the same emotion experienced since with so many other aspects of nature: the delirium is my drug of choice – both cheap and with no after effects beyond a feeling of well-being!

I was lost in my reverie and startled to hear my grandmother’s approaching footsteps – this was ‘forbidden territory’ where dire warnings had warned that there was a big fox (even then an attractive thought to me…). She was calling my name, but in no angry way and I turned to have her hug me and utter through her tears “ Paul fach, your little brother Philip has been taken to live with Jesus and the angels”…disbelief gave way to blind rage for, only the day before, I had been driven by my grandfather in his immaculate Austin 7 (Ruby) to see a new brother I longed for. This was an important occasion and my grandfather, always dapper, had donned his trilby hat and spats for the occasion. For months I had bored everyone rigid with tales of what we would do together. I had not imagined a sister for I already had one of those and now… that baby brother was not there. Philip had been born with a hole in the heart and he survived but three days in those times before repair became routine. The effect on all of us was devastating – I became a difficult withdrawn child (and proceeded to difficult adult…or so I am told!)  and my anger and hurt at my brother being ‘taken’ laid the firm foundations of my atheism. No benevolent deity – not even the brooding bible-black entity of my grandmother’s rain soaked chapel.

That memory is still vivid – people say five year olds have no real appreciation of death. wrong, wrong, wrong… I can see Philip in my mind’s eye now – tiny, seemingly perfect and blonde where the rest of us were swarthy, back-haired Celts from birth. The memory has never left me for, as a child I revisited it night after night before falling asleep

Two years later, my dear brother Peter came along and, when he got bigger, I took him everywhere with me – usually on my shoulders to look for butterflies, find ponds with newts, look for birds’ nests and a host of other things. Peter is both my brother and my very dear friend – guitarist extraordinary, fossil collector, cook and excellent company – kind to a fault. He is very much in my thoughts at the moment for, after a period of unbelievable (and utterly unnecessary) stress, he is recovering from a heart attack. I can hardly wait to get him back out here with us for a bit of Podere Montecucco nature therapy and some sunshine. His passion for fossils and minerals matches mine for insects and flowers…to outsiders we can bore for Europe when allowed to. We share a connection to the land around us via slightly different yet over-lapping routes.

A brother in a million - Pete -saddles up his guitar whilst vocalist Ash Morgan (he of the current The Voice fame) lubricates his tonsils in preparation at my daughter Hannah's wedding in August 2007.

A brother in a million – Pete saddles up his ’335′ guitar whilst vocalist Ash Morgan (he of the current ‘The Voice’ fame) lubricates his tonsils with water in preparation at my daughter Hannah’s wedding in August 2007. The guitarist choses a more traditional form of libation to get his fingers moving!

Posted in Articles, Comment, inspiration, Italian Life, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Hands-Off. Hearts-Off. CB

claybolt_04102013_DSC9832_low_res

At the conclusion of a recent talk on Meet Your Neighbours a member of the audience shared his view that, when it comes to photographing wildlife, species should only be handled by trained biologists; that animals and plants should be “left alone” by the layperson. I have to admit that I was rather taken off-guard by his comment. After all, the entire purpose of MYN is to help connect people with the wildlife in their own community and a roomful of supportive attendees seemed to agree that this was important. I reiterated to the commentator that our photographers work with licensed biologists when dealing with endangered or protected species but that for others, we work within a code of ethics that puts the well-being of the subject first. Yet, afterwards, I couldn’t help but dwell on his words. Why does this “hands-off” mentality exist?

Certainly a connection with nature doesn’t always have to come in the form of physical touch, but in my heart, I believe that an actual “touch-connection” with a species can be powerful. In particular, when it comes to a child’s connection with nature. Humans are a tactile species. Sure, you can see a butterfly in a field-guide, but nothing beats the elation that comes from the moment when a swallowtail perches on your fingertip for the first time or the experience of actually touching the soft silky texture of a snake’s scales with your own fingertips. This makes nature real to us and this participant’s reservation –admonition even– is a well-meaning symptom, I believe, of mankind’s growing separation from the natural world. We are part of nature just the same as the fly that lands on our arm to lap salt from our skin, or the phoebe that returns each year to built its nest under the eaves of my home. And yet, some still subscribe to the idea that it all comes down to us against them, which equates to nothing more than a divorce from our heritage and an unintentional arrogance that somehow we’ve moved past all that.

Of course, my sarcastic side wanted to ask whether or not he had checked the radiator grill of his car lately for six-legged corpses, or whether or not he had been careful to watch his feet while walking into the event hall in case a poor, passing ant happened to be crossing his path. But, of course, that would do no good. I recognize this.

What it all boils down to, in my thinking, is that we can take two approaches:

1.) Make nature separate, something somewhere else that is above mankind and unaccessible. In the end, I believe that this will ultimately not only result in more species preserved behind glass in a museum somewhere, but that it will also rob our own species of ever being able to return back to our true home. We’ve strayed so far and we desperately need to return to “the garden” as it were. Have we evolved so much that we are somehow beyond all that now?

2.) Begin to recognize (remember) that all species interact in various ways. That the eco-systems consist of chains of organisms that interact on a daily basis. We are not exempt from this. The difference is that we can use the knowledge that we have, and the consciousness that we have, to be good stewards, to love our fellow creature and promote their continued protection. Yes, this can all be taken too far. I realize that if there is a way for a humanity to abuse a privilege, it will be done, but this isn’t what I’m talking about and hopefully you as the reader will understand this. 

In short, I believe that cutting ourselves off from contact with nature will ultimately mean a death sentence for all of us.  I understand that my opinions in this piece may not sound politically correct. So, what do you think? Has an actual, physical connection with the wildlife where you live made a difference in your own lives?

Posted in Comment | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Scottish Speakers. NB

I’ve recently been recruited by the Edinburgh-based bureau, Scottish Speakers, who will now handle bookings for presentations I give in the UK. I will continue to offer the same format, of day long workshop (free to the club) and evening presentation, as before.

Posted in Comment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nikon: wildlife wanted – but dead or alive? PHD

A few days ago, I received a brief note from my daughter-in-law, Fran Yeoman to ask whether it was common knowledge in the nature photography world, that Nikon was linked directly with trophy hunting. It certainly was not to me and I said so – Fran just happens to be a news editor at the Independent and they were researching and subsequently ran this story http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/the-wrong-kind-of-photo-shoot-nikon-in-the-line-of-fire-over-rifle-sights-for-big-game-hunting-8556123.html?origin=internalSearch

Hunting Nikon

There is a quote from Stefano Untherthiner, whom I met at WildPhotos 2008. We maintain contact and I can vouch for the fact he is a man driven by a passionate love for his subjects.

“I’ve used Nikon since I was a young boy, fascinated by nature and wildlife. I always saw Nikon as a company close to nature, but I was wrong,” he said.

“I don’t understand and can’t agree with their support for trophy hunting, which sends out entirely the wrong message to global photographers who love nature. Wildlife needs protecting now more than ever, and I urge the company to end its support for trophy hunting.”

I am disappointed in Nikon, but not surprised, for this is a world when all is deemed legitimate in the corporate world in the pursuit of profit – and several on-line comments said as much. It is just one hopes for better from a company that has spent time and money allying itself with some of the very best in the business – in fact, until recently the majority of winning entries in the Veolia Wildlife Photographer of the World Competition were taken on Nikon equipment. Canon have made inroads and have a reputation, not just for great, state of the art equipment, but also for listening to and promoting the photographers who use their cameras and lenses. Nikon has long seemed to exude a corporate arrogance ‘ we are Nikon we do not need to listen.

Well, gentlemen, you do for you cannot claim, on the one hand, to be the wildlife  photographer’s best friend and, on the other, to  involve yourself with blasting the life force from those creatures by providing the best gun sights available and boasting about that. There is a clear dichotomy that, I hope, somebody at Nikon has the wit to see, although Nikon UK have stayed mum since the revelation hit the press.

Nikon’s advertising might lead you to believe that it is the camera that takes the image and plenty of devotees back up that fallacy by providing free, fawning testament to the greatness of the God Nikon (usually, by rubbishing other makes of camera and lenses they have never used).

In the digital world, before the D800 and D800E arrived, Nikon were behind the game (no pun intended) and Canon surged into the lead, True, Nikon make some superb lenses but so do others and, as a highly demanding user of ‘glass’ I know that the Nikon 105mm f/2.8 AF ED macro is excellent but the Sigma 150mm f/2.8 macro outshines it in the resolution and contrast stakes. So, Nikon is not irreplaceable and I would suggest that many should question how they can invest their hard earned money in Nikon equipment when that company shows such callous indifference to the plight of wildlife and game in particular. I, for one, will not stay amongst the Nikon-faithful: I was wavering, but no more.

Trophy Hunting is big business,  as Hannah Kent Martin notes in the Independent”Wealthy western hunters typically pay tens of thousands of pounds to shoot big game. South Africa earns around $100m a year by sanctioning the hunting (which it classes as “eco tourism”), leading to the deaths of approximately 54,000 animals. Hunters typically target the biggest and strongest animals, who provide the more attractive trophies (stuffed animals and fur rugs etc).”

So, time to make voices heard and all those who trumpet Nikon’s greatness might stop and think – and what about those flagship enterprises upon whose products the Nikon logo appears? It would be a jolt to Nikon to see those black and yellow signatures stripped off, or at least I would hope so.

South Africa labels its trophy hunting as ‘eco tourism’ where overfed individuals mostly male (but not entirely) stand astride a ‘kill’, sacrificed to make these emotional inadequates revel in their superiority. Just get a whiff of testosterone-filled  dominance over nature – that need to carry your testicles around in a wheelbarrow, guys. Not too sure what it does for the ladies involved – maybe they just trundle that ol’ barrow, as they say.

Yes, such members of the human race are pathetic and deserve to be vilified but there are many of these callous individuals prepared to fork out thousands of dollars. Hypocritical exploitation is all around- in Japan the slaughter of whales continues annually under that flag of convenience ‘scientific research’.  Just a thought – maybe Nikon make the sights for harpoon guns? Certainly they would not perceive any ethical dilemma in doing so on current evidence.

China is that most rapacious of all nations when it comes to destruction of wildlife to feed the lucrative superstitions of oriental medicine – where ground rhino horn and tiger bones are claimed to add rigidity to the flaccid members of those who use them. And because our governments wish to make lots of Yen we are told we must ‘respect’ their cultural heritage (a contradiction in terms) even when it leads to the obscenity of widespread destruction of the world’s wildlife for short-term gain. And so it goes on…

Well Nikon, I have been contemplating the purchase of a D800E but my hard-earned euros will be directed elsewhere. Like Stefano Untherthiner (and I hope thousands of others) I feel utterly let down. yes it is naive but then, like most people involved in the natural world I dream, however foolishly, of better times when the reality is that it has all gone too far down the road to hell.

Cameras are important but the hand and the eye behind them is what produces the image, Nikon, and I think you have some rapid decisions to make. Claimed support of wildlife and the backing of trophy hunting are mutually exclusive so what is it to be, Nikon, wildlife: dead or alive?

Posted in Articles, Comment, Conservation, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 17 Comments

Thumping versus tickling. NB

Anyone who has experience of defiant children will know that there are two ways to get them to stop doing something they shouldn’t.  If you’re so disposed (and I don’t endorse this) you can thump them until they desist. On a societal level, this is the equivalent of trying to bring about behavioural change through legislation and sanctions – a top down approach. If you’re smart, you will tickle them instead until they give up. The end result is the same but the legacies of these two approaches are profoundly different.

I saw parallels in this way of thinking when I came across nudge theory for the first time and the way various administrations are trying to use it to change behaviours in society.

Green NGOs, as I described in my document Framing a Green Communications Strategy for the Real World, share the same problems as governments when it comes to persuading people to change their behaviour, in this case, for the good of the planet. Few have figured out any ways to tickle people into behavioural change, but one outstanding exception is RARE. Check out their site and compare that approach to the baffling new, ill-disguised fundraiser by the RSPB: Pioneers: New Solutions to Nature’s Greatest Threats. I’m not sure if this means Big Avocet is going to protect us from floods, tsunamis and hurricanes but when we are told that “when it comes to choosing who best to meet the needs of threatened wildlife in the twenty-first century … you can put your trust in us” I hear the same corporate voice that has got us into this mess: Big Conservation knows best and all we need to do is give it our money. It’s just another item of discretionary spending. Oh come on, tickle me instead.

Posted in Comment | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

PhotoTrap triggering system for sale. NB

My almost unused PhotoTrap gear is up for sale for £230 plus VAT and shipping. If you’re looking for a versatile and accurate beam system in its own hard case, then this American design is the business. Here’s Paul’s assessment of it. All is working fine.

If you’re interested, just email me at niall@niallbenvie.com . I can take payment by Paypal (or credit card, via Paypal, if you don’t have a Paypal account)

Posted in for sale | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Meet Your Neighbours technical standards. NB

Shoulders-back-chest-out-chin-in-head-up, I need to lay the law down here!  When it comes to the technical specifications for Meet Your Neighbours pictures, we’re needing uniformity so that ALL the attention is on the subject rather than the prowess of the photographer. We want a picture of a broad-hipped danglefly from Australia to have just the same look as that of a hare-lipped hoghopper from Florida so the pictures are only about the the animals portrayed.

Since the start of the project, we’ve shifted the goalposts slightly (to make your life and ours simpler) but one thing that has not changed is our requirement for a background that is 255 in each channel: pure white. It is this that makes MYN pictures so useful to designers as they can lay the image straight out on a page without having to do any cutting out. This also allows us to create the species composite panels that are gaining popularity as a way to illustrate biodiversity (not least through David Liittschwager’s One Cubic Foot project). It’s also vital to get the balance of front and back lighting right: enough back light to show translucence, enough front to fill shadows but not overwhelm the backlight. Noticeable shadows ruin the atmosphere of the picture and the front light must be diffused: twin undiffused flashes are too harsh.

Now, I confess that there is a little divergence of opinion between Clay and me about the necessity of shoot bugs on a transparent set held at a distance from the backlit white background. He has produced many great pictures with the animal sitting directly on a piece of white acrylic whereas I, and others, have made just as many spoiled by over-lighting from underneath. This is the second most common problem I see when editing MYN submissions, easily solved if the subject is placed on a transparent set and held at some distance from the white background. I address this issue on page 25 of my ebook.

The most common problem however, is framing. In short, the more “unconcluded elements” present in the picture, the more limited its uses. Unconcluded elements arise when things in the picture are cut off: part of the animal, the branch it’s sitting on, stems and other plant parts, you name it. One delicate plant stem meeting the edge of the frame is fine. But if there are a lot then it can’t just be placed on a white page without putting a frame around it: it looks weird otherwise (page 38 of the ebook). If you’ve cropped in tightly to boot then you’re sunk because a frame is going to look like it’s crowding the subject. Please, keep things as simple as possible within the frame: we’re trying to photograph specimens rather than make regular photos that just happen to have a white background.

So, here’s a quick rundown of the technical specifications we need:

• 8 bit, Adobe RGB ,JPEG saved at “Maximum” quality or “12″.

• Keywords and description need to be applied in the appropriate fields (this is most easily done in the Library module if you’re using Lightroom.)

• Files should  be named using this protocol: your name, the country the images were shot in then the file number.

• Backlit pure white background, 255 in each channel, to each corner of the picture with diffused front fill.

Easy! We’re happy to look at submissions from anywhere in the world not already covered or species groups not covered in the geographical areas with an existing photographer .

Posted in Meet Your Neighbours | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Meet Your Neighbours enters a new phase. NB

I’ve long bemoaned the fact that none of the major nature photo competitions admit anything but standard images and bar “radical” (that is, imaginative) representations such as multi-image panels or, heaven forbid, field studio photographs. Well that has just changed. Fellow blogger, Paul Harcourt Davies has won the portfolio category in the International Garden Photographer of the Year Competition with a collection entitled, “A hidden world within 20 metres of home” – all shot in the field studio for Meet Your Neighbours. Congratulations to Paul – and to the competition organisers whose framing of the rules provides a platform for genuine creativity in the representation of plants and garden wildlife.

Beyond Paul’s success, interest in MYN is growing steadily. New photographers contact us each week about joining and the list of publication credits is beginning to increase. Clay enjoyed a great response recently when he spoke about the project at NANPA  as did Dutch photographer Joris van Alphen when he addressed the 2013 sell-out PIXperience conference in Amsterdam last week. I will be making a presentation about field studio photography and Meet Your Neighbours at WildPhotos in London this October.

As time has gone on, the role of MYN has become ever clearer in our minds. Quite simply, field studio photography is the most versatile, detailed and engaging way to represent overlooked species of animals and plants: to record biodiversity beyond the ranks of penguins, polar bears and elephants. Composite species panels communicate the variety of life in a defined area better than any traditional photographic method can.

The usefulness of the field studio technique as a way to record overlooked species has been acknowledged in National Geographic’s return invitation to MYN to shoot on its forthcoming bioblitz (my apologies to German readers for this baffling “English” term) in Louisiana, my participation in one in England last year and Joris’s recent work on a scientific expedition in Borneo. We are very keen that more scientists recognise the vital role that MYN can play in communicating their findings and that they link up with our network of over 50 photographers worldwide. If you’re one of those scientists, please contact either Clay or me through the Meet Your Neighbours site.

 

Posted in Meet Your Neighbours | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Field studio birds, 3. NB

How hard can it be to get the 4 metres from my office to the hide in my garden to photograph small birds in the field studio? Much harder than it reasonably should be if the last 3 weeks of intensive proposal writing, meetings, applications and other “work to get work” are any indication.

Still, technically, things are sorted now. One Ranger Quadra head lights the background from behind but because of the sight line I need to connect a second head to the pack with its receiver facing the Skyport trigger to fire the first flash.  Front fill is provided by an old SB26 Speedlight (with built-in IR trigger) firing through those sheets of Flyweight (aka Corlite) envelope stiffener on the right.

_

Pretty much all the small birds coming to the set are very picky about where they will perch. The robin (above) perches on nothing but this piece of gutter and normally refuses to leave “the ground” (the turfs I have elevated for a better shooting angle) while the tree sparrows cannot be tempted onto anything more alluring than a piece of barbed wire. If the goldfinches ever come back, I may have more luck with them.

For those of you interested in the technical details…these pictures were shot with a (13 year old) AFS Nikkor 500mm f4 with x 1.4 converter on a D700 from 5.5 metres. A D800 would offer a lot of advantages, not least by having focus points near the edge of the frame in DX crop mode.

 

Posted in Meet Your Neighbours | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments