I was interested – and in a strange way, reassured – to learn more about the work of Santa Fé-based Matthew Chase-Daniel. Reassured because here is someone who is thinking the same way as I am about multiple image works – and receiving “art world” recognition for it. Though there are many parallels, we differ fundamentally in how we assemble the final work. To my way of thinking, elements without a border separating them are, in most cases, too bewildering to look at. Our perception is of separate elements that combine to produce the experience of a place and I like to maintain that distinctiveness with a border. Chase-Daniels prefers to butt every up close – and sometimes it works. This interpretation of a cloudscape in Estonia follows his style.
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- 0
-
Meta

Very different!! I prefer it turned anti clockwise on the vertical but thats just me!
Hello Craig
(Edited) – upside down, you mean?!
best
Niall
Just one turn to the left, more pleasing on the eye as the clouds look more natural on the horizontal.
That’s really restful to look at. There’s something about it that I can’t just put my finger on – but I like it all the same. Something to hang on the wall and ponder…. hmm yes !