A tale of two cities and their orchids. PHD

Since the season is upon us I thought I would put up a few orchid posts – a way of engendering a personal sense of optimism…

Each year, here on the hill, I find I am fooled by spring. Where we live at 450m altitude on slightly acid soils nothing ‘florally’ is happening when it is exploding elsewhere. It is easy to forget about flowers for other things are so distracting – the birdsong is something that fills me with that ‘good to be alive’ feeling. On Easter Monday morning Lois nudged me (none too gently) at 6.30am to gloat that she had just heard the nightingales this year: in fact I had heard them nearer the coast two days previously but they are not deemed to be ‘ours’ and so not count. Then, later this month ‘our’ orioles will return and so will the bee-eaters to their burrows in an old quarry on the hill opposite.

Just a few mornings ago whilst in the garden I glanced skywards to see first one silhouette and then another two as three short-toed eagles (in Italian Biancone – ‘big white ones) high above the house made their way along the valley to the Alto Piano (high plain) of Alfina a dry expanse of steppe-like vegetation that affords them the snakes they feed on. No, I still cannot believe it – it is not something to take for granted as a kid I dreamed of seeing so many of these ‘rare’ birds.

To get a first dose of ‘orchidiocy’ for this season we headed off to Terni. an industrial city that sits at the gateway to the Sibillini and some wonderful limestone hills. The first task is always to negotiate a tortuous urban road system that evolved and was never designed to reach a windswept cemetery behind which rises a scrub-filled hill.

The Tyrrhenian Ophrys (Ophrys tyrrhena) near Terni taken with a 15mm  rectangular fish-eye

The Tyrrhenian Ophrys (Ophrys tyrrhena) near Terni taken with a 15mm rectangular fish-eye

There, I photographed my choice of a myriad orchid faces of a highly variable species called the Tyrrhenian Ophrys (Ophrys tyrrhenica). It is one of a number of species thought to have arisen from crossing and back-crossing of various Ophrys and often included under the umbrella term of Ophrys arachnitiformis (literally spider –like). Often the orchids in this group are incredibly variable – a sign of them not having ‘settled down’ in a genetic niche.

the prize of the day a yellow form of Ophrys tyrrhena found a day or so before by eagle-eyed Pino Rattini

the prize of the day a yellow (hypochromic) form of Ophrys tyrrhena found a day or so before by eagle-eyed Pino Rattini

Just a week or so later another ‘local’ orchid flowers there – the Hornet Ophrys (Ophrys crabronifera) – another insect mimic flowers but in slightly different spots. Where they overlap the confusion of intermediates will keep any ‘orchidiot’ in raptures and one rewarding aspect of living near rich populations of single ‘species’ is that there is an increased likelihood of finding the more unusual variations such as the yellow (hypochromic) forms – deficient in both the red and blues anthocycanin pigments. Many Ophrys exhibit such flowers and two are included with this article.

another very local species the Hornet Ophrys (Ophrys crabronifera) that flowers just a week or so later on the same hills

another very local species the Hornet Ophrys (Ophrys crabronifera) that flowers just a week or so later on the same hills. The usual form with a pointed apex is on the left and the rare yellow variant next to it.

The second city is Viterbo, this time in Lazio rather than Umbria. Rising high to the east of the city is the long-dead volcano of Mt Cimini, comprehensively covered in chestnut woods. Near the small community of Canepine there is some particularly venerable and well-kept chestnut woodland where, on an April day with clear blue skies, you can see carpets of magenta and yellow orchids – two forms of the same species, the Roman Orchid (Dactylorhiza romana) growing through the mossy banks of the understorey.

Now, there are far too many tales of disaster in the orchid world where man’s urge to cover the land with concrete has obliterated numerous colonies. However, here, for once there is an encouraging tale here. Modern cultivation practice with these chestnuts means that the grasses and other plants beneath the trees are scythed once in summer to keep the terrain clear: when chestnuts fall in autumn they can be literally ‘hoovered’ up with a giant vacuum cleaner. By this time orchids and other flowers are over and have set seed.

Roman Orchids (Dactylorhiza romana) growing inthe understory of an ancient chestnut wood nr Canepine on Mt Cimino

Roman Orchids (Dactylorhiza romana) growing inthe understory of an ancient chestnut wood nr Canepine on Mt Cimino

In spring, however, the under-storey is left untouched and the more competitive grasses do not grow – there is just a carpet of mosses with blue and white anemones (Anemone appennina). This proves to be an ideal habitat for a wide range of wild orchids – first to appear are the magenta/yellow (and intermediates) spikes of the Roman Orchid, which a few weeks later is replaced by another magenta/yellow combination of Early Purple orchids (Orchis mascula) and pale lemon Provence Orchids (Orchis provincialis)… in a quick flowering sequence after this there are butterfly orchids (Platanthera chlorantha), the Violet Limodore (Limodorum abortivum), Sword-leaved helleborine (Cephalanthera longifolia)…and occasional red helleborine (C. rubra). It is a species rich habitat with butterflies like the Southern Festoon whose larvae devour the pale-flowered birthwort (Aristolochia pallens). This is a wood that really works… a managed, productive woodland with ancient chestnuts gnarled and hollowed by the centuries – still going strong.

I clutch at things like this – perhaps pathetically at times – but it fires the eternal optimism that keeps me on the path I have chosen. 

4 Responses to A tale of two cities and their orchids. PHD

  1. Ophrys arachnitiformis again

    Is it coincidence that I found this link in my mailbox RSS folder along with the one for your post?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8632814.stm

    I could do with some Mediterranean warmth right now!

  2. paulhd says:

    Hello Annie,

    Yes, entirely coincidence and extremely interesting. I have always maintained that one can witness evolution in progress with Ophrys because of the association with insect and flower…what is intriguing is that the hybrid produces a scent cocktail that brings a third bee species in and thus selects its own pollinator, in effect maximising the chance of the new hybrid surviving and becoming a ‘species’, whatever that means with this genus of orchid…I have been interested in them since I discovered my first ‘bee orchid’ as a 10 year old…which means quite while! In fact, out and about with a group of Italian botanists last week the consensus was that the more you know the less you understand about these orchids!

    best regards

    Paul

  3. Pedersen and Faurholdt list O. tyrrhena as O. x arachnitiformis and include no less than 9 former species in the taxon. Their supposition is that the entire swarm descends from the hybridization of O. fuciflora ssp. fuciflora and O. sphegodes ssp. sphegodes.

    As testament to the shifting nature of the taxonomy of the genus, they hint that even more species may be involved. Is it any wonder they are so variable?

  4. paulhd says:

    Hello Carlo,

    Thanks for your comment. I agree that it is no wonder they are so variable. Problems have always arisen in attempts to impose order on the rag-bag of ‘species’ that Pederson and Faurholdt now embrace as Ophrys x arachnitiformis. I have long maintained that this is one of those areas where we witness evolution in progress (something that the feed Annie Haycock provides in her comment seems to bear out). In fact, I would suggest that these orchids are ‘in transition’ in that some might become stable species and others not as local conditions and pollinators dictate. You mention the nine former ‘species’ that are now included by P&F under Ophrys x arachnitiformis – I know of other populations clearly linked that could just as well be ‘named’ and this number of ‘species’ would rise. I make no secret of the fact that I am no admirer of the fashion for proliferation of species in the genus Ophrys and think P & F have done a very good job in trying to impose some sort of tentative order. In the 1962 Monograph by Erich Nelson there is one whole folio page just of ‘arachnitiform’ faces. Nelson searched for Ophrys for years (he published a work in 1931 then nothing until 1962) and he had a very good sense of the innate variation possible in Ophrys. Others who came after simply ‘re-discovered’ some of the faces he had illustrated and renamed them as ‘species’. It is amazing what can be done with a Linnaean binomial system of classification but some entities such as these orchids that have originated from hybrid swarms test that concept to the limits. I have photographs of O. tyrrhena from one site that could be passed off as O morisii, splendida and so on…P&F also say that although they think a part of the complex arose from O. fuciflora ssp. fuciflora and O. sphegodes ssp. sphegodes that there are probably more subspecies involved on either side… When you think how, in the Italian peninsula and islands alone Ophrys fuciflora can show such diverse ‘subspecies’ such “apulica, biancae, candica, celiensis, lacaitae, oxyrrynchos, parvimaculata, tetraloniae…” all with distinct pollinators to say nothing of the subspecies within the Ophrys sphegodes group then the possibilities for mix and match are incredible. If one then adds ‘back-crossing’ into that then it is clear it will never be sorted out on morphological characteristics alone. Whether future refinements in DNA analysis will one day discriminate differences so small who knows. At one stage of my life (for a couple of decades and more) I was passionately interested in Ophrys taxonomy…and I still have an unfinished monograph that also included Turkey and further east. I am now very much in favour of the P & F cautious approach and accept that these taxa are ‘in flux’…it may be cowardice but life is too short! I admire them then I photograph them!

    best wishes

    Paul

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>